Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance
Piersa v. Phx. Ins., 269 Conn. 915 (Conn. 2004)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2004-06-09
- Topic
- general
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 752 (AC 24188), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a self-insured municipal employer may reduce the limits of its uninsured motorist coverage by the amount of *916compensation benefits paid without reducing it to writing?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17206. Decided June 9, 2004 Jon Berk, in support of the petition. William J. Melley III, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Piersa v. Phoenix Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 752 (AC 24188), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a self-insured municipal employer may reduce the limits of its uninsured motorist coverage by the amount ofThe Supreme Court docket number is SC 17206. Decided June 9, 2004 Jon Berk, in support of the petition. William J. Melley III, in opposition.*916 compensation benefits paid without reducing it to writing?”