Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Pazera v. Pazera
216 Conn. 819
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1990-10-04
- Topic
- litigation
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the order of the trial court to sell the marital home constitute an arguable violation of a constitutional or statutory right of the plaintiff within the meaning of State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27? “2. If not, should Curdo be expanded to recognize this order as a final judgment for purpose of appeal?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pazera v. Pazera. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the order of the trial court to sell the marital home constitute an arguable violation of a constitutional or statutory right of the plaintiff within the meaning of State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27?
“2. If not, should Curdo be expanded to recognize this order as a final judgment for purpose of appeal?”