Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Marcus v. DuPerry

Marcus v. DuPerry, 220 Conn. 927 (Conn. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1991-10-24
Topic
general

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 293, is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable for lack of consideration? “2. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable as contrary to public policy? “3. Was the plaintiff entitled to a quantum meruit recovery?”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marcus v. DuPerry. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
3 opinions

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 293, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable for lack of consideration?

“2. Was the retainer contract between the parties unenforceable as contrary to public policy?

“3. Was the plaintiff entitled to a quantum meruit recovery?”