Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
In re Daniel H.
In re Daniel H., 235 Conn. 913 (Conn. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1995-09-28
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14912) is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Does General Statutes § 46-127, as amended by § 6 (d) of No. 94-2 of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session, apply to the transfer from the juvenile docket to the adult docket in this case? “2. If the answer to the first question is yes, does that application constitute an ex post facto law in violation of either the federal or state constitution?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Daniel H.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 14912) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Does General Statutes § 46-127, as amended by § 6 (d) of No. 94-2 of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session, apply to the transfer from the juvenile docket to the adult docket in this case?
“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, does that application constitute an ex post facto law in violation of either the federal or state constitution?”