Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Grimes v. Housing Authority
Grimes v. Hous. Auth., 239 Conn. 918 (Conn. 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1996-09-18
- Topic
- general
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 324 (AC 14894), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the class action statute of limitations tolling rule, as articulated in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1973), and its progeny, did not apply so as to toll the statute of limitations applicable to the plaintiffs’ class action claims?” *919Decided September 18, 1996 Edward T. Krumreich and Miles F. McDonald, Jr., in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Grimes v. Housing Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 324 (AC 14894), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the class action statute of limitations tolling rule, as articulated in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1973), and its progeny, did not apply so as to toll the statute of limitations applicable to the plaintiffs’ class action claims?”