Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.

247 Conn. 954

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1999-01-04
Topic: commercial

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 701 (AC 17345), is granted, limited to the following issue: *955The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16060. William F. Corrigan, in support of the petition. Joseph T.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed General Accident Insurance v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 701 (AC 17345), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*955 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16060. William F. Corrigan, in support of the petition. Joseph T. Sweeney and Daniel P. Scapellati, in opposition. Decided January 4, 1999

“Did the application for automobile insurance with liability limits higher than the uninsured-underinsured motorist limits constitute a written rejection of the right to uninsured-underinsured motorist coverage equal to the amount of liability coverage?”