Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Economos v. Liljedahl Bros.

273 Conn. 913

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2005-03-11
Topic: general

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 578 (AC 24877), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly vacated the arbitration award because the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law?” *914The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17394. Karen L. Dowd, Wesley W. Horton and Anita M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Economos v. Liljedahl Bros.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 578 (AC 24877), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly vacated the arbitration award because the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law?”

*914 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17394. Karen L. Dowd, Wesley W. Horton and Anita M. Varanes, in support of the petition. James H. Lee and David R. Clemens, in opposition. Decided March 11, 2005

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.