Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Doe v. Marselle
235 Conn. 915
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1995-09-28
- Topic
- bankruptcy
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 360 (AC 13338), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the second amended complaint did not allege a willful violation of General Statutes § 19a-583 (a)? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counts had been properly stricken?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Doe v. Marselle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 360 (AC 13338), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the second amended complaint did not allege a willful violation of General Statutes § 19a-583 (a)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counts had been properly stricken?”