Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Copeland v. Warden

Copeland v. Warden, 220 Conn. 926 (Conn. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1991-10-16
Topic
general

The petitioner David Copeland’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 10, is granted, limited to the following issue: “After a defendant has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, does the trial court have the authority to impose a criminal sentence consecutive to the defendant’s psychiatric commitment?”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Copeland v. Warden. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The petitioner David Copeland’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 10, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“After a defendant has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, does the trial court have the authority to impose a criminal sentence consecutive to the defendant’s psychiatric commitment?”