Checklist · Natural Resources

Selling Timber, Pursuing Timber Trespass, or Answering a Wildfire Claim: A Practical Checklist

33 U.S.C. § 1342

Type
Checklist
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-06-01
Topic
Natural Resources

This checklist covers timber and wildfire from four positions: selling timber, harvesting it, discovering an unauthorized cut, and pursuing or defending a wildfire claim. It begins with the seller's sequence built around the consulting forester and the boundary marking obligation that prevents the field's most expensive dispute, and the workers' compensation verification that prevents its most catastrophic one. It gives the harvester the compliance sequence for forest practices, water quality, and species requirements. It provides a timber trespass investigation ordered by evidence perishability — stumps first, because they degrade — with the damages measure determination that governs which expert to retain. It closes with a wildfire claim sequence that runs the discretionary function screen before anything else where a government defendant is involved, because that analysis determines whether a case exists at all.

Selling Timber, Pursuing Timber Trespass, or Answering a Wildfire Claim: A Practical Checklist

Natural Resources > Timber, Forestry, and Wildfire Liability | Published 1 June 2024 - Updated 3 May 2025 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

Which sequence do you need?

☐ Selling timber — Part 1. ☐ Harvesting — Part 2. ☐ Your trees were cut without authority — Part 3. ⚠️ Document the stumps first; that evidence degrades. ☐ Defending a trespass claim — Part 4. ☐ A wildfire claim — Part 5, and ⚠️ Part 6 first if a government defendant is involved.

Part 1 — Selling timber

Before marketing:

☐ ⚠️ RETAIN A CONSULTING FORESTER WHO WORKS FOR YOU — not the buyer's forester. The fee is a percentage of the sale and the difference in realized price routinely exceeds it several times over. This is the single highest-return decision in a timber sale. ☐ Cruise the timber — species, volume, grade, and value. ☐ Confirm ownership of the timber. ⚠️ Check for TIMBER RESERVATIONS in the chain of title — they may be decades old and are missed by routine searches. Also check: mortgage restrictions on harvest; conservation easements; carbon or conservation agreements; life estate or co-tenancy issues. ☐ If a life tenant or one of several co-tenants: ⚠️ obtain the other interests' consent. Harvest by a life tenant may be waste; a co-tenant cannot convey the whole. ☐ Notify the mortgage holder if the loan requires it. ☐ ⚠️ HAVE THE BOUNDARY SURVEYED AND MARKED before anyone bids. This single step prevents the most expensive dispute in the field. ☐ Determine tax treatment before structuring the sale — lump sum and pay-as-cut are treated differently. ☐ Check forest practices requirements — notification, permits, plan preparation, and whether a licensed forester must prepare it.

The contract:

☐ Precise description of timber sold — marked trees, diameter limits, defined area with a map ☐ ⚠️ Boundary marking — who, how, when, and who pays ☐ Structure — ☐ lump sum ☐ pay-as-cut, with scaling method and verification ☐ Price, payment schedule, and performance security ☐ Term and disposition of uncut timber at expiration ☐ Title and risk of loss at severance ☐ Access routes, gates, keys, and restrictions ☐ Utilization standards — stump height, top diameter, minimum specifications ☐ ⚠️ Residual stand damage limits and a damages formula ☐ Roads and skid trails — approval, standards, water bars, closure ☐ Site condition at completion — slash, landings, seeding, road closure ☐ Compliance covenant — forest practices, water quality, wetlands, species, permits ☐ Insurance and indemnity, landowner as additional insured ☐ ⚠️ WORKERS' COMPENSATION CERTIFICATE VERIFIED BEFORE ENTRY. An uninsured logging injury on your land is catastrophic and largely uninsurable — general liability, homeowner, and farm policies all exclude it, and several States treat an uninsured contractor's crew as the landowner's statutory employees. ☐ Weather and seasonal restrictions ☐ Default, termination, and cure

During and after:

☐ Photograph the stand before harvest, from fixed points, with dates. ☐ Monitor operations — boundary compliance, utilization, residual damage, road condition. ☐ Verify load tickets and scale records against payment if pay-as-cut. ☐ Inspect at completion against the site condition provision before releasing final payment or security. ☐ Confirm reforestation obligations and their deadlines.

Part 2 — Harvesting

☐ ⚠️ OBTAIN AND VERIFY THE BOUNDARY. Use a survey, not a plat. Walk it with the landowner. Mark it. Photograph the marking with dates. This is the entire defense to a trespass claim. ☐ Note any physical boundary evidence — fences, blazed lines, changes in stand age — and reconcile it with the survey. ⚠️ Ignoring an obvious indicator defeats good faith. ☐ File the forest practices notification or permit and any required plan. ☐ Determine water quality obligations — construction stormwater coverage under 33 U.S.C. § 1342 and 40 C.F.R. Part 122; wetland or stream crossing permits under 33 U.S.C. § 1344. ⚠️ Federal jurisdiction narrowed after Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency — check state law, which reaches further in many States. ☐ Assess endangered species exposure. 16 U.S.C. § 1538 prohibits take, and ⚠️ Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for a Great Oregon holds that habitat modification actually killing or injuring wildlife is take. Where a federal permit or funding creates a nexus, consultation under 16 U.S.C. § 1536 applies. ☐ Observe riparian buffers, slope restrictions, and wet-weather limits. ☐ On federal land: the sale is governed by 16 U.S.C. § 472a and 36 C.F.R. Part 223, within plans under 16 U.S.C. § 1604 and 36 C.F.R. Part 219, with prohibitions at 36 C.F.R. Part 261. ☐ Safety: the general duty at 29 U.S.C. § 654 and standards at 29 C.F.R. Part 1910 apply fully. ⚠️ Logging is among the most dangerous occupations in the country. ☐ Fire precautions — spark arrestors, fire tools on site, hot-work restrictions, and shutdown during high-danger conditions. ☐ ⚠️ Do not transport or sell timber taken in violation of state law — 16 U.S.C. § 3372 makes it a federal offense.

Part 3 — Your trees were cut

⚠️ Work these in order. The evidence degrades.

Week one — before anything else:

☐ ⚠️ DOCUMENT THE STUMPS. Count them. Record species and diameter at the stump. Photograph each with a scale reference and a date. This is the foundation of the two most valuable damages measures, and stumps weather, are ground out, are buried under slash, and are obscured by regrowth within a season. ☐ Photograph the site generally — skid trails, landings, road damage, residual stand damage, and rutting. ☐ Do not clean up, salvage, or replant until documentation is complete. ☐ Locate any pre-cut evidence — photographs, aerial imagery, prior cruises, listing photos. ☐ Preserve any communications with the cutter, the neighbor, or the buyer.

Then:

☐ Order a survey to establish the true boundary. ☐ Retain a consulting forester to determine volume and value from the stumps. ☐ ⚠️ DETERMINE YOUR STATE'S MEASURE OF DAMAGES BEFORE RETAINING FURTHER EXPERTS: • Stumpage — forester proves it — lowest figure • Converted value — forester plus mill records — often 3–5× stumpage; usually reserved for willful cutting • Diminution in market value — appraiser — ⚠️ frequently understates loss on timberland • Restoration cost — arborist or landscape professional — can exceed land value; usually subject to a reasonableness limit • Aesthetic / amenity value — certified arborist — minority rule; large for ornamental yard trees ⚠️ The choice frequently matters more than the multiplier, and a case worked up with the wrong expert is often unsalvageable. ☐ Assess willfulness versus good faith — what boundary evidence physically existed, how visible was it, and what did the cutter do about it? ☐ Identify every defendant — cutter, crew, contractor, buyer, mill. ☐ Consider federal exposure — 16 U.S.C. § 3372 if timber crossed a state line. ☐ ⚠️ Check the statutory attorney's fee provision — it frequently determines whether the case is economically viable. ☐ Add related claims — conversion, trespass to land, negligence, contract breach, and waste or accounting where a life tenant or co-tenant harvested. ☐ Calendar the limitations period, which for timber trespass is sometimes shorter than for ordinary property claims.

Part 4 — Defending a trespass claim

☐ Produce the survey, the marked boundary, and dated photographs of the marking. ☐ Establish good faith — the survey relied on, the line as marked, the landowner's representation, and the instructions given to the crew. ☐ Identify what boundary evidence actually existed and whether a reasonable operator would have seen it. ☐ Challenge the volume determination — stump-to-DBH conversion, species tables, and assumed merchantable height are all contestable. ☐ ⚠️ Challenge the MEASURE of damages — argue for stumpage where the plaintiff seeks converted value or restoration cost, and for a reasonableness limitation on restoration. ☐ Assess comparative fault — an owner who never established or marked a boundary. ☐ Consider prompt restoration as mitigation, which can substantially reduce exposure. ☐ Check insurance — general liability policies frequently exclude or limit this exposure; confirm coverage early. ☐ Notify the landowner who sold the timber and assess indemnity under the sale contract.

Part 5 — Wildfire claim

Immediately:

☐ ⚠️ If a GOVERNMENT defendant may be involved, go to Part 6 FIRST. ☐ Preserve the scene to the extent possible and document the ignition area before suppression alteration and debris removal. ☐ Attend or arrange representation at the origin-and-cause investigation — ⚠️ this is the only physical evidence there will ever be, and it is examined early by agencies and utility investigators. ☐ Photograph and inventory losses before removal. ☐ Open the first-party insurance claim — see the property insurance guide.

Building the case:

☐ Identify the theory — negligence; ⚠️ inverse condemnation, which is STRICT and whose availability against investor-owned utilities is State-specific and pivotal; nuisance and trespass; statutory fire liability; products liability; premises liability. ☐ Request the utility's records — vegetation management cycles and achieved clearances by circuit; inspection and maintenance history for the specific asset; hardware age and condition; reclosing settings during red flag conditions; de-energization criteria and the decision made. ☐ Obtain weather data — wind, humidity, and fuel moisture at the time and place. ☐ Retain experts — origin and cause, meteorology, utility engineering, and fire behavior. See the expert witness guide. ☐ Assess timber loss under the Part 3 framework if standing timber burned. ☐ Coordinate with subrogation — carriers pursue the same defendant and their claims frequently drive the litigation. ☐ Consider mass resolution structures — consolidated proceedings, settlement funds, and utility bankruptcy; see the class action guide. ☐ Check disaster assistance under 42 U.S.C. § 5121; see the disaster recovery guide. ☐ ⚠️ Review coverage against ACTUAL rebuild cost — demand surge, code upgrades, debris removal, and site conditions make underinsurance the norm after a total loss.

Part 6 — Government defendant: the screen that comes first

⚠️ Run this before investing in the case. It determines whether a claim exists at all.

☐ 1. Calendar the NOTICE OF CLAIM. ⚠️ Frequently 60 to 180 days, jurisdictional, running from the injury. File protectively even if the investigation is incomplete.

☐ 2. Identify the sovereign. Federal claims proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 1346; ⚠️ 28 U.S.C. § 2680 excepts claims based on a discretionary function or duty. Nearly every State has an analogue.

☐ 3. REQUEST THESE DOCUMENTS IMMEDIATELY AND BY NAME: • ⚠️ The burn plan and its prescriptions — wind, humidity, temperature, fuel moisture, holding resources • Spot weather forecasts and observed conditions • Go/no-go documentation and the decision-maker • Incident action plans and resource orders • Qualification records for the burn boss and key personnel • The agency manual provisions said to be mandatory • Inspection and maintenance records where equipment is implicated See the public records guide.

☐ 4. Apply the two-step test of Berkovitz v. United States: Step one — was there judgment or choice? ⚠️ If a statute, regulation, or policy SPECIFICALLY PRESCRIBED a course of action and it was not followed, there is NO discretion and the exception does not apply. Step two — if there was judgment, was it grounded in social, economic, or political policy? Under United States v. Gaubert, ⚠️ where a regulation allows discretion, it is PRESUMED the acts are grounded in policy. United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense confirms that the nature of the conduct, not the actor's rank, controls; Dalehite v. United States established the exception's breadth.

☐ 5. Identify the MANDATORY DIRECTIVE that was violated. ⚠️ This is the whole case. • Wind speed exceeded the plan maximum? ☐ • Humidity below the plan minimum? ☐ • Holding resources below the required number? ☐ • A required weather observation not taken? ☐ • A contingency step in the plan omitted? ☐ • An inspection interval skipped? ☐ If every prescription was met and every judgment was discretionary, the exception likely bars the claim.

☐ 6. Check State-specific additions — design immunity, damages caps, and any fire-specific immunity.

☐ 7. Consider inverse condemnation against the public entity, which may proceed on a different footing than a tort claim; see the eminent domain guide.

The short version

☐ Selling: hire your own consulting forester; ⚠️ survey and mark the boundary before anyone bids; check for timber reservations; verify workers' compensation before entry. ☐ Harvesting: verify the boundary against a survey, not a plat; reconcile any physical boundary evidence; file the notification; check water quality and species obligations. ☐ Trespass: ⚠️ document the stumps in week one — count, species, diameter, photographs with scale. Then survey, then forester, then determine the measure of damages before retaining further experts, then check the fee provision. ☐ Defending: produce the survey and the marked-boundary photographs; establish good faith; contest the volume and the measure. ☐ Wildfire: preserve the ignition area; be present at origin-and-cause; request the utility's vegetation and inspection records; ⚠️ review coverage against actual rebuild cost. ☐ Government defendant: ⚠️ notice of claim first, then the burn plan, then the Berkovitz v. United States screen. The case must rest on a violated mandatory prescription, not on a judgment that went badly.

⚠️ Two habits decide most of these matters, and neither is legal work. Mark the boundary before the crew arrives — it prevents the most expensive dispute in timber practice on both sides. Photograph the stumps in the first week — because the entire quantum of damages rests on evidence that is gone by the second season.

Appendix — Six failures, and the step that catches each

The buyer's forester. A landowner accepts an offer priced by the buyer's cruiser and realizes a fraction of value. Caught by: Part 1's first item. ⚠️ The highest-return recommendation in timber practice.

The plat instead of the survey. A crew works from a recorded plat, crosses an unmarked line, and faces treble damages. Caught by: Part 2's first item.

The uninsured crew. A sawyer is injured; the contractor has no workers' compensation; general liability, homeowner, and farm policies all exclude it. Caught by: Part 1's certificate verification before entry.

The weathered stumps. A trespass matter arrives eighteen months late; volume cannot be established. Caught by: Part 3's week-one documentation. ⚠️ The most common reason a strong claim becomes a weak one.

The wrong expert. A case built on stumpage in a State allowing restoration cost, or on an appraiser where a forester was needed. Caught by: Part 3's measure determination before retention.

The prescribed burn with no theory. Months of investigation into an escaped agency burn, then dismissal on the discretionary function exception. Caught by: Part 6's screen, run first.

Related materials: the article explains why the doctrines take this shape, the comprehensive guide develops timber property, sale contracts, trespass damages, practices rules, and fire liability, and the toolkit supplies the sale contract, the boundary marking protocol, the stump documentation record, the damages worksheet, and the discretionary function screen.

Appendix B — Calendar entries and retention

Set at the start of any timber sale:

☐ Forest practices notification filing deadline ☐ Stormwater permit coverage and notice of termination ☐ Contract term expiration and disposition of uncut timber ☐ Insurance and workers' compensation certificate expiration dates ☐ Payment milestones and security release conditions ☐ Completion inspection before final payment ☐ Reforestation deadline, which may run years after the harvest and is easily forgotten ☐ Warranty or road maintenance obligations

Set at the start of any trespass matter:

☐ Stump documentation — this week ☐ Survey ordered ☐ Forester engaged ☐ Statute of limitations for timber trespass ⚠️ (sometimes shorter than for ordinary property claims) ☐ Demand letter and preservation notice to all potential defendants

Set at the start of any wildfire matter:

☐ ⚠️ Notice of claim deadline where a public entity is involved — 60 to 180 days, jurisdictional ☐ Origin-and-cause investigation date and representation ☐ First-party claim filing and proof-of-loss deadline ☐ Records requests to the agency and the utility ☐ Statute of limitations for each theory, which may differ between tort and inverse condemnation

Retain, in a timber file: the survey and boundary marking photographs · the cruise · the contract and all certificates · load tickets and scale records · permits and notifications · completion inspection · reforestation records

Retain, in a forestry operation's file: boundary instructions given to each crew · the survey relied upon · insurance and workers' compensation certificates by contractor and year · forest practices notifications · water quality permits and inspections · fire precaution compliance records

⚠️ Retain boundary and marking documentation permanently. It is the defense to a trespass claim that may arrive years later, and it is the one document that cannot be reconstructed after the trees are gone.

Related Documents