Checklist · Nonprofit

Forming a Nonprofit and Applying for Exemption: A Practical Checklist

18 U.S.C. § 1519

Type
Checklist
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-06-03
Topic
Nonprofit

A step-by-step operational checklist for forming a nonprofit organization and obtaining recognition of exemption under section 501(c)(3), and for standing up the compliance infrastructure that keeps the exemption once it arrives. Twelve phases cover the threshold question of whether a new entity is the right vehicle at all, choice of entity and state formation, the governance architecture of board, bylaws, and policies, building the organizational test into the documents rather than the intentions, choosing and defending a public charity classification, preparing and filing Form 1023 or Form 1023-EZ within the 27-month window, responding to IRS development letters and reading the determination, the state registrations that a federal determination letter does not supply, compensation and conflicts including the three steps that create the rebuttable presumption of reasonableness, fundraising substantiation and donor restriction discipline, the recurring annual compliance calendar, and the growth events that change classification or create unrelated business income. Each phase carries commentary on the failure mode that produces the problem years later. A worked example carries a fictional youth music charity through every phase with specific numbers.

Forming a Nonprofit and Applying for Exemption: A Practical Checklist

Nonprofit > Governance and Exemption | Published 3 June 2024 - Updated 14 April 2026 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

In brief. Nearly every serious nonprofit problem is a formation problem that took five years to surface — a purpose clause that was never limited, a classification nobody re-tested, a compensation vote nobody documented. Build the file at the beginning. It is the cheapest work in the engagement and the only work that gets easier the earlier it is done.

Keywords: choice of entity, organizational test, dissolution clause, Form 1023, 27-month rule, public support test, Schedule A, solicitation registration, rebuttable presumption, restricted gifts, Form 990

How to use this. Phases 1–4 are formation. Phases 5–7 are the exemption application. Phases 8–12 are the compliance infrastructure that keeps the exemption and keeps the directors out of personal tax liability. The doctrine is in Nonprofit Governance: A Comprehensive Guide to Formation, Exemption, and Fiduciary Duty. The narrative on why the governance pieces matter is The Price of Exemption: Private Benefit, Excess Benefit, and the Duties of a Nonprofit Board.

A standing caution. A federal determination letter grants federal income tax exemption and nothing else. State income, sales, use, and property tax exemptions each require separate applications, charitable solicitation registration is a separate regime in roughly forty states, and governance and fiduciary duty are entirely state law. Never tell a client the determination letter finished the job.

Phase 1 — Should This Entity Exist?

  • [ ] Identify the charitable purpose in one sentence and test it against the § 501(c)(3) enumerated purposes.
  • [ ] Identify who will be served and confirm the class is charitable rather than a named individual or a private group.
  • [ ] Test the alternatives: fiscal sponsorship, a donor advised fund, a program housed at an existing charity, a § 501(c)(4) if advocacy is central, or a for-profit with a social mission.
  • [ ] Build a realistic three-year budget with named revenue sources, not aspirational totals.
  • [ ] Determine whether the founder expects to be employed by the organization, and price that conversation now.
  • [ ] Determine whether any founder-owned business will transact with the organization.
  • [ ] Identify the initial board candidates and count how many are independent of the founder and of each other.
  • [ ] Ask whether the organization will conduct fee-for-service activity, and estimate what share of revenue it will be.
  • [ ] Ask whether the organization will lobby or work near elections.
  • [ ] Confirm nobody intends to operate outside the United States without further analysis.

Why it matters, and the traps. The most valuable advice a lawyer gives in this field is sometimes "do not form this." A fiscally sponsored project can begin next week, costs almost nothing, and converts to its own entity when the revenue justifies it. The trap is founder economics: a founder who expects to draw a salary, sell services to the organization, or control a self-perpetuating board is describing a private business with a charitable mission statement, and the exemption analysis will say so eventually. Have the conversation before the articles are filed, when the answer is still cheap.

Phase 2 — Choice of Entity and State Formation

  • [ ] Choose the entity form: nonprofit corporation (usual), charitable trust, unincorporated association (rarely), or LLC (only if the Notice 2021-56 conditions are met).
  • [ ] Choose the state of incorporation, defaulting to the state of principal operations unless there is a concrete reason otherwise.
  • [ ] Decide member or non-member structure, and record why.
  • [ ] Clear the name with the secretary of state and run a trademark screen before printing anything.
  • [ ] Draft and file articles of incorporation with the organizational test language (Phase 4).
  • [ ] Appoint a registered agent and confirm the address will be monitored.
  • [ ] Obtain an EIN on Form SS-4 — and do not obtain one before the entity exists.
  • [ ] Hold the organizational meeting: adopt bylaws, elect directors and officers, authorize a bank account, ratify pre-formation acts, set the fiscal year.
  • [ ] Qualify as a foreign corporation in every state where the organization will have an office, employees, or a physical presence.
  • [ ] Calendar the annual state report and the 27-month exemption deadline on the day of filing.

Why it matters, and the traps. Two traps recur. First, obtaining an EIN months before incorporation, which starts the organization's tax existence and can shorten the 27-month window measured from formation. Second, the member/non-member decision, which is treated as boilerplate and is close to irreversible: converting a non-member corporation to a membership corporation later requires an amendment that the existing board must approve, and boards do not vote to dilute themselves. Decide deliberately and write down the reason.

Phase 3 — Governance Architecture

  • [ ] Draft bylaws covering board size and composition, terms and staggering, removal, officer roles, quorum, notice, committees, indemnification, and amendment.
  • [ ] Confirm the bylaws satisfy any state minimums on director count and on independence for audit or compensation functions.
  • [ ] Adopt a conflict of interest policy with annual written disclosure, recusal from deliberation and vote, and a required record in the minutes.
  • [ ] Adopt a whistleblower policy and a document retention and destruction policy — the latter because 18 U.S.C. § 1519 applies to nonprofits.
  • [ ] Adopt a gift acceptance policy addressing restricted gifts, non-cash property, real estate, cryptocurrency, and gifts the organization will decline.
  • [ ] Adopt an investment policy consistent with UPMIFA, including a spending policy for any endowment.
  • [ ] Adopt an expense reimbursement policy structured as an accountable plan.
  • [ ] Adopt a compensation approval procedure that tracks the rebuttable presumption (Phase 9).
  • [ ] Establish minute-taking discipline: who drafts, when approved, and what level of detail.
  • [ ] Establish the committee structure: executive, finance/audit, governance/nominating, compensation.
  • [ ] Obtain D&O insurance quotes and confirm the policy covers regulatory investigations and defense costs.
  • [ ] Confirm indemnification in the bylaws is as broad as state law permits and coordinates with the insurance.

Why it matters, and the traps. Form 990, Part VI, asks whether the organization has each of these policies and whether it regularly and consistently monitors and enforces them. That question is answered on a return signed under penalties of perjury. The trap is adopting a beautiful policy suite and then never applying it: an unapplied conflict of interest policy is affirmative evidence that the board knew what it should have done. Adopt fewer policies and actually run them.

Phase 4 — Building the Organizational Test Into the Documents

  • [ ] Limit the purpose clause to one or more exempt purposes; delete any "any lawful purpose" language.
  • [ ] Confirm the articles contain no express power to engage, other than insubstantially, in non-exempt activity.
  • [ ] Include the inurement prohibition and the limits on lobbying and campaign intervention.
  • [ ] Include a dissolution clause dedicating assets to exempt purposes, another § 501(c)(3), or a government for public purposes.
  • [ ] For a private foundation, include the 26 U.S.C. § 508(e) Chapter 42 prohibitions expressly, without relying on a state savings statute.
  • [ ] Confirm the filed, stamped articles say what the draft said — filing offices reject and re-file, and versions diverge.
  • [ ] Confirm the bylaws do not contradict the articles; where they conflict, the articles control and the conflict is a finding waiting to happen.
  • [ ] Describe activities in a narrative specific enough to show exempt purpose and general enough to permit growth.
  • [ ] Identify any activity that could look commercial and prepare the distinguishing facts now.
  • [ ] Identify any private benefit flowing to a founder, vendor, or affiliated business, and quantify it.

Why it matters, and the traps. The organizational test is the easiest test in the field to pass and the one most often failed, because it is failed silently by whoever drafted the articles. Online formation packages routinely produce articles with a general-purpose clause and no dissolution provision. Fixing it is a state amendment filing; discovering it during an examination eight years later is an argument about whether the organization was ever exempt at all. Read the stamped articles yourself. Do not accept a client's assurance that the formation service handled it.

Phase 5 — Classification: Public Charity or Private Foundation

  • [ ] Confirm the organization is not automatically an institution under § 170(b)(1)(A) — church, school, hospital, governmental unit.
  • [ ] Model support under § 170(b)(1)(A)(vi): public support over total support, applying the 2% per-donor limitation and excluding exempt-function revenue from the denominator.
  • [ ] Model support under § 509(a)(2): the one-third support test counting exempt-function receipts subject to the greater of $5,000 or 1% per payor, and the one-third investment income ceiling.
  • [ ] Identify any anticipated gift large enough to blow the 2% limit and consider whether it qualifies as an unusual grant.
  • [ ] If neither test can be met, model private foundation status honestly, including 26 U.S.C. § 4940 tax, the § 4942 payout, and Form 990-PF donor disclosure.
  • [ ] Consider whether a supporting organization structure is appropriate, and price the Type III compliance burden before recommending it.
  • [ ] Confirm the projected funding mix actually supports the classification requested on the application.
  • [ ] Build the Schedule A worksheet now and populate it every year, not at return time.
  • [ ] Identify the year in which the five-year rolling window will first be tested against actual results.
  • [ ] Plan a donor diversification strategy if a single funder will exceed 2% of projected support.

Why it matters, and the traps. Classification is requested at application, based on a reasonable expectation, and then tested against reality. The failure mode is a founding donor who funds 80% of the first three years: the organization is a private foundation in substance and will be reclassified when Schedule A catches up. Reclassification is quiet, retroactive to the second failing year, and expensive — Chapter 42 applies, Form 990-PF becomes the return, and grantmakers that fund only public charities disappear.

Phase 6 — Preparing and Filing the Exemption Application

  • [ ] Confirm the 27-month deadline and file well inside it.
  • [ ] Run the Form 1023-EZ eligibility worksheet, and then decide independently whether the EZ is appropriate.
  • [ ] For the full Form 1023: draft the narrative of past, present, and planned activities; complete the compensation schedules; describe every relationship with officers, directors, and their businesses.
  • [ ] Attach: stamped articles, bylaws, conflict of interest policy, and financial data for up to five years actual or projected.
  • [ ] Disclose every transaction with insiders — leases, purchases, loans, service contracts — with the terms.
  • [ ] Answer the fundraising, foreign activity, grantmaking, and legislative activity questions completely.
  • [ ] Request the § 509(a) classification supported by the modeling in Phase 5.
  • [ ] Complete any applicable schedules: churches (A), schools (B), hospitals (C), supporting organizations (D), late filers (E), homes for the elderly (F), successors to for-profits (G), scholarships (H).
  • [ ] Pay the user fee and file through Pay.gov; retain the submission ID and confirmation.
  • [ ] Calendar a 90-day follow-up and know how to check application status.
  • [ ] Decide whether to make the § 501(h) election on Form 5768 in the first year of any advocacy.

Why it matters, and the traps. Form 1023-EZ is three pages of attestations. It produces a determination letter in weeks and produces nothing else — no reviewed articles, no reviewed narrative, no record. The Taxpayer Advocate Service and TIGTA have documented substantial error rates among approved EZ filers. Use it for genuinely small, genuinely simple organizations. If there is fee revenue, a related entity, an insider transaction, foreign activity, or a growth plan, file the full application — the narrative you write becomes the organization's story, and writing it once, carefully, is cheaper than explaining it later.

Phase 7 — IRS Development and the Determination

  • [ ] Track the application; respond to any development letter within the stated deadline, which is short and enforced.
  • [ ] Answer development questions completely and consistently with the application — inconsistency is what turns a routine file into a referred one.
  • [ ] If the Service proposes an adverse determination, request the administrative appeal to the Independent Office of Appeals before considering litigation.
  • [ ] Preserve exhaustion for a 26 U.S.C. § 7428 declaratory judgment action in the Tax Court, the Court of Federal Claims, or the D.C. district court.
  • [ ] On receipt, read the determination letter carefully: effective date, § 509(a) classification, any conditions, and the filing requirement stated.
  • [ ] Confirm the effective date is the date of formation if the 27-month rule was met.
  • [ ] Store the determination letter where the development staff can find it, because every grantmaker will ask for it.
  • [ ] Prepare the § 6104 public inspection file: application, supporting documents, determination letter, and returns.
  • [ ] Notify donors and correct any premature statements about deductibility made before the letter arrived.
  • [ ] Diarize a classification review at year five, when the support test is first tested on actual data.

Why it matters, and the traps. A determination letter is a ruling on the facts represented. It protects the organization only so long as it operates as described. The trap is the organization that receives the letter, files it, and then evolves — adding a fee-based program, a related entity, or a business relationship with a board member — without ever revisiting whether the represented facts still describe it. Material changes belong on the Form 990 and, for significant ones, in a request for a new ruling.

Phase 8 — State Registrations and Employment Setup

  • [ ] Apply separately for state income/franchise tax exemption where required.
  • [ ] Apply for sales and use tax exemption — many states exempt purchases, fewer exempt sales, and the rules differ by transaction.
  • [ ] Apply for property tax exemption, which is usually county-level, deadline-driven, and use-specific.
  • [ ] Register for charitable solicitation in the home state before soliciting, and in every state where the organization targets donors.
  • [ ] Assess internet solicitation exposure under the NASCO Charleston Principles — targeting and repeated, ongoing, or substantial contributions from a state.
  • [ ] Confirm whether any professional fundraiser or fundraising counsel must register and post a bond, and whether their contract meets state content requirements.
  • [ ] Register any commercial co-venture (charitable sales promotion) and paper it with a written agreement.
  • [ ] Set up payroll: withholding, state registration, workers' compensation, and the § 501(c)(3) unemployment insurance reimbursement election if it is economically favorable.
  • [ ] Classify workers correctly — employee versus independent contractor — and document volunteers separately.
  • [ ] Confirm charitable gaming, raffle, and bingo licensing before any fundraiser involving chance.
  • [ ] Register for lobbying at the federal and state level if thresholds are met — a separate regime from § 4911.

Why it matters, and the traps. Solicitation registration is the most commonly ignored obligation in the sector and the one most likely to produce a public enforcement action, because state charity regulators can see who is soliciting their residents. Registering late generally means back registrations, late fees, and an entry in a public file. The second trap is worker classification: nonprofits use "volunteers" and "contractors" loosely, and a reclassification assessment lands on payroll taxes for all open years.

Phase 9 — Compensation, Conflicts, and the Rebuttable Presumption

  • [ ] Identify every disqualified person under the § 4958 five-year lookback, including founders, substantial contributors, family members, and 35%-controlled entities.
  • [ ] Constitute a compensation committee of members with no conflict of interest as the regulation defines it.
  • [ ] Obtain appropriate comparability data — functionally and financially comparable organizations, independent surveys with disclosed methodology, or actual written offers; for organizations under $1 million in gross receipts, data from three comparable organizations in similar communities suffices.
  • [ ] Approve compensation in advance, and value total compensation: salary, bonus, deferred, severance, insurance, fringes, allowances.
  • [ ] Document contemporaneously — by the later of the next meeting or 60 days — the terms, date, members present and voting, the data and its source, conflicts and recusals, and the basis for any amount outside the data range.
  • [ ] Confirm every economic benefit is reported as compensation when paid on a W-2 or 1099 — vehicles, club dues, spousal travel, tuition, allowances, forgiven loans.
  • [ ] Convert reimbursements to an accountable plan with substantiation and return of excess.
  • [ ] Screen every insider transaction — leases, purchases, professional services — for inurement and private benefit, and obtain an appraisal or bids.
  • [ ] For a private foundation, screen every insider transaction for 26 U.S.C. § 4941 self-dealing, remembering that a bargain price is still a sale and that § 4962 abatement does not apply.
  • [ ] Track compensation against the 26 U.S.C. § 4960 $1 million threshold and the excess parachute rules.
  • [ ] Prepare Schedule L and Schedule J disclosures from the same file that supports the board's decision.

Why it matters, and the traps. The presumption's value is evidentiary, and boards forfeit it through process rather than substance — minutes that say "compensation discussed," a committee member whose independence is arguable, or a survey nobody can source. The deadlier and more common failure has nothing to do with amounts: an unreported benefit is an automatic excess benefit in its entire amount even if total compensation was plainly reasonable. A $9,000 unreported allowance is a $9,000 excess benefit. Fix it with a payroll line, not with a memo.

Phase 10 — Fundraising, Substantiation, and Donor Restrictions

  • [ ] Issue a contemporaneous written acknowledgment for every gift of $250 or more, stating the amount and whether any goods or services were provided.
  • [ ] Issue quid pro quo disclosures under 26 U.S.C. § 6115 for payments over $75 where the donor receives something in return, with a good-faith estimate of value.
  • [ ] Handle non-cash gifts: sign Form 8283 for gifts over $5,000 without appraising them, and file Form 8282 on disposition within three years.
  • [ ] Paper every restricted gift with a written gift agreement stating the purpose, the duration, what happens if the purpose becomes impracticable, and whether the donor reserves enforcement rights.
  • [ ] Include a variance or successor-purpose clause in every endowment agreement so a court petition is not the only remedy.
  • [ ] Segregate restricted funds in the accounting system, not in a memo.
  • [ ] Apply UPMIFA to any endowment: prudence in investing, and a documented appropriation analysis running the seven factors.
  • [ ] Confirm whether the state adopted the optional 7% presumption of imprudence on appropriations.
  • [ ] For any release or modification of a restriction, follow the UPMIFA route: donor consent, court order with attorney general notice, or the small-and-old-fund route with 60 days' notice.
  • [ ] Screen grant agreements from funders for restrictions the organization cannot actually satisfy.
  • [ ] Train development staff that a naming right given to a donor who is also an insider is a private benefit question, not a stewardship question.

Why it matters, and the traps. Restricted funds are the quiet crisis of nonprofit finance. Cash is fungible and accounting systems are not, so an organization under pressure spends restricted money on payroll while believing it will "put it back." That is a breach of the duty of obedience, a potential attorney general action, and a fact pattern that generates personal exposure for the officers who approved it. The drafting fix is a variance clause in every gift agreement; the operational fix is a segregated ledger and a monthly report the board actually reads.

Phase 11 — The Annual Compliance Calendar

  • [ ] File the correct 990-series return by the 15th day of the 5th month, extending once on Form 8868 if needed — electronically, as now required.
  • [ ] Complete Schedule A and re-run the support test; flag any trend toward failure two years out.
  • [ ] Complete Schedule L for every interested-person transaction, and reconcile it against the conflicts disclosures.
  • [ ] Complete Schedule J consistently with the compensation file.
  • [ ] File Form 990-T and pay estimated tax if gross unrelated business income is $1,000 or more.
  • [ ] Compute UBTI by silo under 26 U.S.C. § 512(a)(6), using two-digit NAICS codes, and track NOLs by silo.
  • [ ] Track lobbying against the § 501(h) limits, with grassroots tracked separately against the 25% sublimit; file Form 5768 if electing.
  • [ ] Screen all election-year activity against the absolute campaign intervention prohibition and Rev. Rul. 2007-41.
  • [ ] Renew every charitable solicitation registration and every state qualification and annual report.
  • [ ] Hold the annual meeting, elect directors, collect annual conflict disclosures, and approve minutes.
  • [ ] Obtain the audit or review required by funders or by state law, and have the audit committee meet with the auditor without management present.
  • [ ] Update the § 6104 public inspection file with the newest return.

Why it matters, and the traps. The single most common way exemption is lost is automatic revocation under 26 U.S.C. § 6033(j) for three consecutive years of non-filing — usually by a small organization that changed treasurers and stopped filing a postcard. There is no notice requirement and no administrative appeal; the organization simply appears on the auto-revocation list, contributions stop being deductible, and reinstatement requires a new application. Assign the filing to a person, calendar it twice, and confirm receipt.

Phase 12 — Growth Events That Change the Analysis

  • [ ] Re-test classification whenever a single donor or funder becomes dominant.
  • [ ] Re-test UBIT whenever a new revenue line launches, and decide whether it belongs in a taxable subsidiary.
  • [ ] Before any joint venture, confirm the charity controls the charitable attributes: board majority or program control, a charitable-purpose priority clause, an unaffiliated manager, and a fixed-fee, reasonable-term management agreement.
  • [ ] Before forming a for-profit subsidiary, plan for separateness and for § 512(b)(13) recharacterization of rent, interest, and royalties.
  • [ ] Before forming a § 501(c)(4) affiliate, paper a cost-sharing agreement and set hard rules on funds flow.
  • [ ] Before any merger, conversion, dissolution, or sale of substantially all assets, determine whether attorney general notice or approval is required and put it on the timeline at the term-sheet stage.
  • [ ] Before accepting a government grant, review the Uniform Guidance requirements, audit thresholds, and False Claims Act exposure.
  • [ ] Before hiring the founder's relative or contracting with a director's business, run the full conflicts and § 4958 process.
  • [ ] Before international grantmaking, plan equivalency determination or expenditure responsibility, and screen against sanctions lists.
  • [ ] Re-read the Form 1023 narrative annually and ask whether it still describes the organization.

Why it matters, and the traps. Organizations do not fail their exemption on day one; they drift into failure. Each individual growth decision is defensible, and the cumulative effect is an organization that no longer resembles the one described in its application. The annual re-reading of the original narrative takes twenty minutes and is the highest-yield governance habit in this checklist. On government grants specifically, see The False Claims Act: A Comprehensive Guide to Qui Tam Litigation and Government Fraud Enforcement — grant certifications are actionable statements.

Worked Example

Harborlight Foundation for Youth Music (fictional) begins as a program run out of a church basement by Dr. Amara Vance (fictional), teaching violin to 40 children.

Phase 1. Counsel recommends fiscal sponsorship for the first eighteen months. Harborlight runs under a sponsor's exemption, raises $190,000, and proves the model without carrying entity costs.

Phase 2. At $400,000 in annual revenue, Harborlight incorporates as a non-member nonprofit corporation in its operating state, obtains an EIN the week after the articles are stamped, and calendars the 27-month deadline for 31 months out — allowing a four-month buffer.

Phase 4. The articles limit purposes to music education, prohibit inurement, cap lobbying, bar campaign intervention, and dedicate assets on dissolution. Counsel obtains the stamped copy and confirms the filed text matches the draft. It does not: the filing office truncated the dissolution paragraph. Corrected by amendment within ten days, before the application is filed.

Phase 5. Projected revenue is 55% tuition and ticket sales, 40% contributions, 5% investment income. Under § 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), tuition is excluded from the public support numerator and Harborlight fails. Under § 509(a)(2), tuition counts subject to the $5,000/1% per-payor cap, contributions count, and investment income at 5% sits comfortably under the one-third ceiling. Harborlight requests § 509(a)(2) classification.

Phase 6. Harborlight is EZ-eligible on receipts in its first year but files the full Form 1023, because Dr. Vance will be compensated and a board candidate owns an instrument retailer. The narrative describes the scholarship program, the fee schedule, and the sliding scale. The application discloses the anticipated instrument purchases and states they will be competitively bid.

Phase 7. A development letter asks how the sliding scale is administered and whether scholarship recipients are selected on objective criteria. Harborlight answers in nine days with the written policy. The determination letter arrives four months later, effective the date of incorporation, classifying Harborlight under § 509(a)(2).

Phase 8. Harborlight registers to solicit in its home state and in the two adjacent states where it holds concerts, elects reimbursing status for unemployment insurance, and discovers that its "volunteer" teaching assistants receiving $1,200 stipends are employees. Corrected in the same quarter.

Phase 9. Six years later, revenue is $8.4 million and the board considers raising Dr. Vance's salary from $214,000. The compensation committee is reconstituted with three directors with no relationship to Harborlight programs. It obtains a compensation study of eleven arts education organizations with budgets between $5 million and $14 million in comparable markets, plus one written competing offer Dr. Vance received. It approves $298,000 in total compensation — below the amount originally proposed — and documents the terms, the data, the source, the recusals, and the reasoning in minutes approved 41 days later. It separately identifies a $6,000 annual car allowance that had never been reported, adds it to the W-2 prospectively, and files corrected returns for the open years.

Phase 12. Harborlight and Pell Street Partners (fictional) negotiate a rehearsal-hall LLC. The first draft gives each side three managers, lets Pell Street appoint the general manager, and allocates 70% of net revenue to Pell Street until capital return. Counsel rewrites it: four of seven managers appointed by Harborlight; an operating agreement clause that the venture is operated to further charitable purposes and that this obligation has priority over profit; Harborlight control over youth pricing, scholarship access, and programming hours; a general manager unaffiliated with Pell Street; and an appraisal supporting the site contribution. Keystone Ridge Foundation (fictional), the family foundation of director Ellis Trawick (fictional), is excluded from funding the venture because Trawick's participation would raise a § 4941 self-dealing question no amount of fairness could cure. Harborlight also stops buying instruments from Trawick Instruments, Inc. (fictional) and moves the purchases to a competitively bid vendor.

What made it work: starting under fiscal sponsorship rather than forming too early, reading the stamped articles instead of the draft, modeling both support tests before requesting a classification, filing the full application because the facts were not simple, running a genuine compensation process with sourced comparables and 60-day minutes, catching the unreported allowance before an examiner did, and fixing the joint venture's control terms in the operating agreement rather than in a side letter.

Related Documents

Articles

Guides

Checklists

Toolkits