Opinion · California Supreme Court
Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.
Indem. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Comm., 174 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1917)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- California Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- California
- Date
- 1917-01-29
- Topic
- general
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102]. We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution. The application for a writ of review is denied. Rehearing denied. *Page 316
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].
We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Rehearing denied. *Page 316