Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Laich Industries Corp. And Sports Products v. Baskin-Robbins USA Co., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Laich Indus. Corp. & Sports Prods. v. Baskin-Robbins USA Co., Defendant/cross-Appellant, 11 F.3d 1070 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-12-07
- Topic
- bankruptcy
11 F.3d 1070 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. LAICH INDUSTRIES CORP. and Sports Products, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BASKIN-ROBBINS USA CO., Defendant/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 93-1163, 93-1195.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Laich Industries Corp. And Sports Products v. Baskin-Robbins USA Co., Defendant/cross-Appellant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
LAICH INDUSTRIES CORP. and Sports Products, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BASKIN-ROBBINS USA CO., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 93-1163, 93-1195.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Oct. 13, 1993.
Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc
Declined Dec. 7, 1993.
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.
Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit, sitting by designation