Gilbert L. MARCUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

holding that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over claims for Social Security benefits | holding that this court has no jurisdiction over claims contesting the denial ofSocial Security disability benefits | holding that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over claims for social security benefits | holding “that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act ... over claims to social security benefits____” | holding “that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits . . . .” | holding “that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act over claims to social security benefits.” (internal citation omitted) | rejecting a plaintiffs claims for Social Security benefits because the Claims Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act | affirming dismissal of an action in Claims Court seeking review of denial of social security benefits for lack of jurisdiction | stating this Court does not have jurisdiction over claims related to social security benefits | stating this Court does not have jurisdiction over claims related to social security benefits | “[W]e hold that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits.” | “[T]he Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits.” | “[W]e hold that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits.” | "[T]he Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits[.]" | “[W]e hold that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act . . . over claims to social security benefits.” | "[W]e hold that the [Court of Federal Claims] has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act ... over claims to social security benefits .... " (citations omitted) | “[T]he [Court of Federal Claims] has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1988), over claims to social security benefits . . . .” | “[W]e hold that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act ... over claims to social security benefits, even considering appellant’s assertions that he is entitled to relief under the Constitution.” | “[W]e hold that the Claims Court has no jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1988), over claims to social security benefits, even considering appellant’s assertions that he is entitled to relief under the Constitution.” (citations omitted)