Faust v. United States

continuing threat supported by unadjudicated criminal acts occurring after murder including robbery, threatening to kill store clerk and stealing car | continuing threat supported by unadjudicated criminal acts occurring after murder including robbery, threatening to kill store clerk and stealing car | finding criminal activity occurring after murder sufficient to support continuing threat | police making untrue statements "to induce [the defendant] to confess" did not render the defendant's confession involuntary | police making untrue statements “to induce [the defendant] to confess” did hot render the defendant’s confession involuntary | constitution does not require that jurors consider any particular evidence to be mitigating | constitution does not require that jurors consider any particular evidence to be mitigating | sufficiency review of mitigating evidence not required under Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments