Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Armco Inc. v. United States
Armco Inc. v. United States, 760 F.2d 249 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1985-05-02
- Topic
- general
MARKEY, Chief Judge. Appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 590 F.Supp. 1273 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1984), that substantial evidence supported the United States International Trade Commission’s negative injury determinations with respect to imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Decision The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by Senior Judge Maletz. AFFIRMED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Armco Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 52 opinions
ARMCO. INC. v. UNITED STATES,760 F.2d 249(Fed. Cir. 1985)
ARMCO INC., BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP., FLORIDA WIRE CABLE CO., AND SHINKO WIRE
AMERICA, INC., APPELLANTS, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE.
Appeal No. 84-1715.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 2, 1985.
Page 250
Jack M. Simmons, III, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee U.S. With him on the brief was Michael P. Mabile, Acting Gen. Counsel.
Garry P. McCormack, Fox Glynn Melamed, New York City, argued for intervenor Tecnor. With him on the brief were Raymond F. Stechel and John R. Haran.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[2]Decision
[3] The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by Senior Judge Maletz.
[4] AFFIRMED.Page 1254