Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
United States v. Antoine D. Washington
United States v. Antoine D. Wash., 98 F.3d 646 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-09-26
- Topic
- international-arbitration
98 F.3d 646 321 U.S.App.D.C. 197 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Antoine D. WASHINGTON, Appellant.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Antoine D. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Antoine D. WASHINGTON, Appellant.
No. 96-3006.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 26, 1996.
Before: WILLIAMS, SENTELLE, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed December 15, 1995, denying appellant's motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.