Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Melvin Jackson v. United States

332 F.2d 317

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-05-25
Topic: bankruptcy

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a conviction of second degree murder. Able court-appointed counsel urges a number of contentions, which we have carefully considered. But we find no error affecting substantial rights. The judgment of the District Court will be Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Melvin Jackson v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

JACKSON v. UNITED STATES,332 F.2d 317(D.C. Cir. 1963)

Melvin JACKSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17807.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued November 18, 1963.

Decided December 12, 1963.

Petition for Rehearing en Banc Denied May 25, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; George L. Hart, Jr., District Judge.

Mr. Forbes W. Blair, Washington, D.C. (appointed by this court), for appellant.

Mr. John A. Terry, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and William H. Collins, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction of second degree murder. Able court-appointed counsel urges a number of contentions, which we have carefully considered. But we find no error affecting substantial rights. The judgment of the District Court will be

Affirmed.

Circuit Judge WRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.