Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Mary D. May v. District of Columbia

228 F.2d 53

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1955-11-23
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The District of Columbia Tax Court affirmed the Assessor’s appraisal of certain shares of stock owned by Arthur J. May at his death in 1950. The question for us to decide is whether the Tax Court was clearly wrong. District of Columbia v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mary D. May v. District of Columbia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,228 F.2d 53(D.C. Cir. 1955)

Mary D. MAY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.

No. 11562.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Submitted November 2, 1955.

Decided November 23, 1955.

Page 54

Mr. Louis M. Denit, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas S. Jackson, P. Baxter Davis and Martin R. Fain, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, submitted on the brief for petitioner.

Mr. George C. Updegraff, Asst. Corp. Counsel for District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corp. Counsel, and Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, submitted on the brief for respondent.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The District of Columbia Tax Court affirmed the Assessor's appraisal of certain shares of stock owned by Arthur J. May at his death in 1950. The question for us to decide is whether the Tax Court was clearly wrong. District of Columbia v. Pace,320 U.S. 698,64 S.Ct. 406,88 L. Ed. 408. We think it was not clearly wrong.

Affirmed.