Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Joseph E. Piatt v. United States

Joseph E. Piatt v. United States, 329 F.2d 883 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1964)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-02-20
Topic: international-arbitration

How later courts describe this case

concurring opinion of Wright, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Joseph E. Piatt v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

PIATT v. UNITED STATES,329 F.2d 883(D.C. Cir. 1964)

Joseph E. PIATT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 18118.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 10, 1964.

Decided February 20, 1964.

Mr. Milton V. Freeman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Richard B. Sobol, Washington, D.C. (both appointed by this court) was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. David Epstein, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and Donald S. Smith, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel appointed by this court to represent the appellant have presented for our consideration, by brief and oral argument, the only issues fairly raised by the record. Having examined these issues, we find them without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. Assigned counsel's effort, however, in presenting the issues available, and thus insuring an appeal for an indigent defendant, is in the best tradition of the bar.

Affirmed.