Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
In Re Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
In Re Jeffrey M. Young-Bey, 978 F.2d 745 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-09-16
- Topic
- litigation
978 F.2d 745 298 U.S.App.D.C. 248 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Jeffrey M. YOUNG-BEY, Petitioner. No. 92-3198.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Jeffrey M. Young-Bey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re Jeffrey M. YOUNG-BEY, Petitioner.
No. 92-3198.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 16, 1992.
Before STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the petition for an emergency writ of mandamus, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied. On August 17, 1992, the district court denied petitioner's motions for release pending appeal. Petitioner has therefore obtained the relief requested, a ruling on his motions, making his petition moot.