Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Willie Lee Richmond v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Roger Crist, Superintendent of the Arizona State Prison

986 F.2d 1583

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-03-17
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • statistical evidence is insufficient 17 to prove that decisionmakers in petitioner’s case acted with discriminatory purpose

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Willie Lee Richmond v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Roger Crist, Superintendent of the Arizona State Prison. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
25 opinions
RICHMOND v. LEWIS,986 F.2d 1583(9th Cir. 1993)
WILLIE LEE RICHMOND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL A. LEWIS,fn*
DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND ROGER CRIST, SUPERINTENDENT
OF THE ARIZONA STATE PRISON, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES.
No. 86-2382.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 17, 1993.
[1] On Remand From the United States Supreme Court; Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice.
Before: ALARCON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS,fn**District Judge.
[2] Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on December 31, 1992 inRichmond v. Lewis,___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 528, 121 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992), we vacate our opinion at948 F.2d 1473(9th Cir. 1991), reverse the district court, and remand for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

[3] Appellant's motion to issue mandate is denied as moot.Page 446
  1. Samuel A. Lewis and Roger Crist have been substituted for their respective predecessors in office, James R. Ricketts and Donald Wawrzaszek, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(1). ↩
  2. The Honorable Albert Lee Stephens, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. ↩