Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Virgilio Patricio Flores

732 F.2d 1438

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1984-05-08
Topic: general

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 729 F.2d 593, is withdrawn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Virgilio Patricio Flores. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

UNITED STATES v. FLORES,732 F.2d 1438(9th Cir. 1984)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. VIRGILIO PATRICIO FLORES,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

No. 82-1445.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1984.

Carla M. Woehrle, Talcott, Vandevelde Woehrle, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.Page 1439

William Fahey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment,729 F.2d 593, is withdrawn.