Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Pinkus

United States v. Pinkus, 466 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1972)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-10-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller, 466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Pinkus. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
UNITED STATES v. PINKUS,466 F.2d 1405(9th Cir. 1972)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM PINKUS,
DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 72-1069.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 16, 1972.
Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court, Central District of California, William P. Gray, Judge;333 F. Supp. 928.
Before MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.fn*
PER CURIAM:
[1] Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller,466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed.

[2] It is so ordered.Page 19
  1. The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Senior District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation. ↩