Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Noushfar
United States v. Noushfar, 140 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-04-01
- Topic
- general
ORDER The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows: The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read: In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the *1245judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Noushfar. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
ORDER
The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:
The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read:
In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the*1245 judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”