Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Facchini
851 F.2d 1221
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-07-14
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Facchini. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Danielle FACCHINI, et al. Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 86-3094, 86-3097 to 86-3102, 86-3104 to 86-3111,
86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121 to 86-3123, 86-3127 to
86-3128, 86-3137 to 86-3140, 86-3148,
86-3154, 86-3161, 86-3177.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 14, 1988.
Prior report: 832 F.2d 1159.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Upon the vote of a majority of the nonrecused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.