Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Carty

462 F.3d 1066

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2006-08-23
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

ordering rehearing en banc in United States v. Zavala, 443 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2006), and United States v. Carty, 453 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Carty. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

UNITED STATES v. CARTY,462 F.3d 1066(9th Cir. 2006)

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alphonso Kinzar CARTY,

Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appelle, v. Juan

Antonio Zavala, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 05-10200, 05-30120.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 23, 2006.

Kimberly M. Hare, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, Allan Burrow, USBO-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Milagros A. Cisneros, Federal Public Defender's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant Alphonso Kinzar Carty.

Dennis M. Charney, Esq., Eagle, ID, for Defendant-Appellant Juan Antonio Zavala.

Before MAEY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinions shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

These matters are consolidated for purposes of en banc rehearing.Page 1067