Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Salazar-Paucar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

290 F.3d 964

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-05-09
Topic
general

PAEZ, Circuit Judge. ORDER The opinion of this court filed in this case on February 28, 2002, slip op. at 3329 (281 F.3d 1069), is amended as follows: At slip op. at 3346, first full paragraph after “V. CONCLUSION,” delete “for a grant of asylum,” and replace with “for the Attorney General to exercise his discretion whether to grant Petitioner asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1); Duarte de Guinac v. INS, 179 F.3d 1156, 1164 (9th Cir.1999).” Delete “also” in the following sentence, to read: “The application for withholding of deportation is granted.” With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny panel rehear*965ing. The petition for panel rehearing in 99-71306 is denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Salazar-Paucar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion