Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Roy G. Andersen and Nancy R. Andersen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Roy G. Andersen & Nancy R. Andersen v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 341 F.2d 584 (9th Cir. 1965)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-02-18
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The question is whether the findings of the Tax Court are clearly erroneous. We do not find them so. Taxpayers assert that the Commissioner in the stipulation of facts prior to trial had stipulated that every statement in the attached exhibits was true. We do not so read the stipulation.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Roy G. Andersen and Nancy R. Andersen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
ANDERSEN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,341 F.2d 584(9th Cir. 1965)
Roy G. ANDERSEN and Nancy R. Andersen, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.
No. 19502.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 18, 1965.
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, David I. Granger, Jonathan Cohen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
Taxpayers assert that the Commissioner in the stipulation of facts prior to trial had stipulated that every statement in the attached exhibits was true. We do not so read the stipulation.
Taxpayers assert that the Commissioner, in opening statement, had so limited the issues as to preclude the Tax Court from deciding in this fashion. We do not so construe the statement when read in its entirety.
Judgment affirmed.