Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rodgers v. Watt
Rodgers v. Watt, 705 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-05-13
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rodgers v. Watt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
RODGERS v. WATT,705 F.2d 1176(9th Cir. 1983)
R.E. RODGERS AND BARBARA RODGERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JAMES G. WATT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 80-3482.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 13, 1983.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
[1] ORDER FOR PUBLICATION
[2] Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.Page 1475