Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Planned Parenthood Fed'n of Am., Inc. v. Ctr. for Med. Progress
897 F.3d 1224
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2018-08-01
- Topic
- general
analyzing the “de- gree to which the anti-SLAPP provisions are consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” | discussing California anti-SLAPP law which is substantially similar to that of Nevada | “[W]hen an anti-SLAPP motion to strike challenges only the legal sufficiency of a claim, a 4 district court should apply the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) standard and consider 5 whether a claim is properly stated.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 34 opinions
The concurrence opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on May 16, 2018, and published at 890 F.3d 828, is amended as follows:
At opinion page 838, delete the sentence: < I respectfully suggest that we should take this opportunity to fix this error in our court's precedent with a call of the case en banc.>
And replace the deleted sentence with: < Although the propriety of interlocutory appeals for denials of anti-SLAPP motions was not briefed by the parties in this case, I respectfully suggest that we take the opportunity to fix this error in the future.>
*1225The Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc remains pending.IT IS SO ORDERED.