Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Packard v. United States

Packard v. United States, 339 F.2d 887 (9th Cir. 1964)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-12-22
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard, D.C., 236 F.Supp. 585).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Packard v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

PACKARD v. UNITED STATES,339 F.2d 887(9th Cir. 1964)

James B. PACKARD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 19318.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 22, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; Sherrill Halbert, Judge.

Irving C. Sugarman, Bernheim, Sugarman Gilbert, Richmond, Cal., for appellant.

Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial court. (United States v. Packard, D.C.,236 F. Supp. 585).

Page 888