Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nordyke v. King
575 F.3d 890
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-07-29
- Topic
- bankruptcy
575 F.3d 890 (2009) Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nordyke v. King. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty; County of Alameda; County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15763.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 29, 2009.Donald Kilmer, Jr., The Law Offices of Donald Kilmer, San Jose, CA, Don B. Kates, Esquire, Battleground, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Thomas Peter Pierce, Richards, Watson and Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, Sayre Weaver, Esquire, Richards, Watson & Gershon, Brea, CA, Richard E. Winnie, *891 Esquire, Office of County Counsel, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Rawlinson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.