Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mehdipour v. Marcus & Millichap (In re Mehdipour)

Mehdipour v. Marcus & Millichap (In re Mehdipour), 139 F.3d 1303 (9th Cir. 1998)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1998-03-27
Topic: general

The judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in its opinion filed on October 16, 1996, reported at 202 B.R. 474 (9th Cir. BAP 1996). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mehdipour v. Marcus & Millichap (In re Mehdipour). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

IN RE MEHDIPOUR,139 F.3d 1303(9th Cir. 1998)

In re: FARIDEH MEHDIPOUR, Debtor.

FARIDEH MEHDIPOUR, Appellant, v. MARCUS MILLICHAP, Appellee.

No. 96-56764

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 2, 1998 — Pasadena, California.

Filed March 27, 1998

COUNSEL

Paul M. Brent, Steinberg, Nutter Brent, Santa Monica, California, for the appellant.

James B. Yobski, Bronson, Bronson McKinnon, Los Angeles, California, for the appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Jones, Hagen, Alley, Judges, Presiding.

D.C. No. CC-95-02279-JHAL

Before: Melvin Brunetti, David R. Thompson, and Thomas G. Nelson, Circuit Judges.

[1] ORDER

[2] The judgement of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in its opinion filed on October 16, 1996, reported at202 B.R. 474(9th Cir. B.A.P. 1996).

[3] IT IS SO ORDERED.Page 1309