Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mauro v. Arpaio

Mauro v. Arpaio, 162 F.3d 547 (9th Cir. 1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1998-12-02
Topic
bankruptcy

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1,1998), is withdrawn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mauro v. Arpaio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Mauro v. Arpaio, No. 97-16021, slip op. at 10013 (9th Cir. Sept. 1,1998), is withdrawn.