Mark Chesler v. Carolyn Colvin

holding that “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [the claimant’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | holding that the ALJ satisfied the clear and convincing reasons standard and recognizing that “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [the plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | concluding symptom testimony was 11 properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that 12 [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | concluding symptom 13 testimony properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s 14 conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | concluding symptom testimony was properly rejected in part because 3 “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health 4 symptoms were situational” | concluding 8 symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the 9 ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | concluding symptom testimony properly rejected in part 13 because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health 14 symptoms were situational” | holding symptom testimony was properly rejected where claimant’s mental health symptoms were situational | finding “the record supports the ALJ’s conclusion that [the plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational, and so unlikely to persist once [the plaintiff’s] circumstances improved” | affirming an ALJ’s finding that a 5 claimant’s allegations were “contradicted by his continual search for work and his ability to work 6 whenever he could find a job” | affirming an ALJ’s 16 discounting of Plaintiff’s testimony and medical opinions where “the record supports the ALJ’s 17 conclusion that Chesler’s mental health symptoms were situational, and so unlikely to persist 18 once Chesler’s circumstances improved” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s 26 conclusion that [claimant’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] 15 the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record 4 support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were 5 situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record 11 support[ed] the ALJ's conclusion that [plaintiff's] mental health symptoms were 12 situational” | symptom testimony 9 properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that 10 [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part 23 because “the record support[ed] the ALJ's conclusion that [plaintiff's] mental health symptoms 24 were situational” | symptom testimony properly 14 rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that 15 [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the 1 2 ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony 14 properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that 15 [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony 18 properly rejected in part because “the record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that 19 [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the 8 record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms 9 were situational” | symptom testimony properly rejected in part because “the 15 record support[ed] the ALJ’s conclusion that [plaintiff’s] mental health symptoms 16 were situational”