Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order
Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order, 209 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2000-04-24
- Topic
- general
ORDER Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lucio Flores Ortega,petitioner-Appellant v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden,order. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
ORDER
Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).
The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.