Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Laguana v. Ansell

212 F.2d 207

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1954-04-15
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. For the reasons given in the Court’s opinion filed February 29, 1952, 102 F.Supp. 919, the judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Laguana v. Ansell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

LAGUANA v. ANSELL,212 F.2d 207(9th Cir. 1954)

Jesus LAGUANA, Appellant, v. Archie ANSELL, Acting Tax Commissioner and

Acting Treasurer, Government of Guam, and United States of America,

Appellees.

No. 13387.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 15, 1954.

Appeal from the District Court of Guam, Territory of Guam; Paul D. Shriver, Judge.

Albert A. Spiegel, Santa Monica, Cal., Lyle H. Turner, Agana, Guam, for appellant.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, I. Henry Kutz, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., John P. Raker, U.S. Atty., Agana, Guam, Howard D. Porter, Atty. Gen. of Guam, Clarence A. Davis, Solicitor, Department of Interior, Lincoln, Neb., A.M. Edwards, Chief Counsel, Office of Territories, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C., Shirley Ecker Boskey, Attorney, Department of Interior, New York City, for appellees.

Jules E. Kohn and Ralph J. Tucker, Kansas City, Mo., amici curiæ.

Before HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges, and LEMMON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the Court's opinion filed February 29, 1952,102 F. Supp. 919, the judgment is affirmed.Page 274