Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Kurth v. Carr

Kurth v. Carr, 106 F.2d 1003 (9th Cir. 1939)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1939-10-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Upon motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause,' and appellants consenting thereto, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause, Ex parte Kurth, 28 F.Supp. 258, be dismissed for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate, of this court herein issued forthwith.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kurth v. Carr. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
KURTH v. CARR,106 F.2d 1003(9th Cir. 1939)
Hans KURTH and Gunther Habermann v. Walter E. CARR, District Director of
Immigration, etc.
No. 9306.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 2, 1939.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.
Hans Kurth and Gunther Habermann, in pro. per.

Ben Harrison, U.S. Atty., and Ralph E. Lazarus, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before GARRECHT and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellee to dismiss appeal for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause, and appellants consenting thereto, it is ordered that the appeal in this cause, Ex parte Kurth,28 F. Supp. 258, be dismissed for failure of appellants to file record and docket cause, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court herein issued forthwith.