Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.

Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc., 90 F.4th 1042 (9th Cir. 2024)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2024-01-18
Topic
bankruptcy

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 18 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIM CARTER MARTINEZ, on behalf of No. 22-35305 herself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05725-MJP Plaintiff-Appellee, Western District of Washington, Tacoma v. ORDER ZOOMINFO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kim Martinez v. Zoominfo Technologies, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
                             FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         JAN 18 2024
                                                                     MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIM CARTER MARTINEZ, on behalf of              No.    22-35305
herself and all others similarly situated,
                                               D.C. No. 3:21-cv-05725-MJP
               Plaintiff-Appellee,             Western District of Washington,
                                               Tacoma
 v.
                                               ORDER
ZOOMINFO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation,

               Defendant-Appellant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

      Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.