Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jones v. City of Los Angeles
Jones v. City of L.A., 505 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2007)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2007-10-15
- Topic
- commercial
ORDER The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 444 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jones v. City of Los Angeles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
JONES v. ANGELES,505 F.3d 1006(9th Cir. 2007)
Edward JONES; Patricia Vinson; George Vinson; Thomas Cash; Stanley
Barger; Robert Lee Purrie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES;
William Bratton, Chief; Charles Beck, Captain, in their official
capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-55324.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed October 15, 2007.
Amy Jo Field, Esq., Rockard J. Delgadillo, Esq., Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: RYMER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and REED,fn*District Judge.
ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion informing us that they have settled this action and seeking dismissal of the appeal, remand and withdrawal of our opinion, reported at444 F.3d 1118(9th Cir. 2006). Granting the motion in full, we dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate our opinion inJones v. City of Los Angeles,444 F.3d 1118(9th Cir. 2006), and remand the action to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this Order.IT IS SO ORDERED.
- The Honorable Edward C. Reed, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. ↩