Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Joint Council Of Teamsters No. 42 v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.
662 F.2d 531
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-10-01
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
662 F.2d 531 108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3238, 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,229, 2 Employee Benefits Ca 2243 JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 42, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, of America; and General Teamsters and Food Processing Local No. 87, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; The Building Industry Association of California, Inc.; The Engineering Contractors Association, Inc.; and The Southern California Contractors Association, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-5869.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Joint Council Of Teamsters No. 42 v. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3238, 93 Lab.Cas. P 13,229,
2 Employee Benefits Ca 2243
JOINT COUNCIL OF TEAMSTERS NO. 42, International Brotherhood
of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, of
America; and General Teamsters and Food Processing Local No.
87, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; The
Building Industry Association of California, Inc.; The
Engineering Contractors Association, Inc.; and The Southern
California Contractors Association, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 80-5869.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1981.
Decided Oct. 1, 1981.
George A. Pappy, Pappy, Kaplon & Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
John H. Stephens, Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Mariana R. Pfaelzer, District Judge, Presiding.
Before ELY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and COPPLE,* District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The issues here involved were thoroughly considered by District Judge Pfaelzer in the court below. Essentially upon the basis of Judge Pfaelzer's Opinion, reported at 520 F.Supp. 3 (C.D.Cal.1981), the District Court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
The Honorable William P. Copple, United States District Judge, District of Arizona, sitting by designation