Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Jerome B. Vernazza v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Ims/cpas & Associates Vernon T. Hall Stanley E. Hargrave v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Jerome B. Vernazza v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, Ims/cpas & Assocs. Vernon T. Hall Stanley E. Hargrave v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, 335 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2003)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2003-07-17
Topic
bankruptcy

335 F.3d 1096 Jerome B. VERNAZZA, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent. IMS/CPAS & Associates; Vernon T. Hall; Stanley E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jerome B. Vernazza v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Ims/cpas & Associates Vernon T. Hall Stanley E. Hargrave v. Securities and Exchange Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

335 F.3d 1096

Jerome B. VERNAZZA, Petitioner,
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.
IMS/CPAS & Associates; Vernon T. Hall; Stanley E. Hargrave, Petitioners,
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent.

No. 01-71857.

No. 02-70016.

No. 3-9042.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 5, 2003.

Filed April 24, 2003.

Amended July 17, 2003.

Sheldon M. Jaffe, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner Jerome B. Vernazza.

Thomas D. Giachetti, Princeton, NJ, and Ashleigh C. Swayze, Stark & Stark, PC, Lawrenceville, NJ, for petitioners IMS/CPAs & Associates, Vernon T. Hall, and Stanley E. Hargrave.

Eric Summergrad, Deputy Solicitor, and Mark Pennington, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for the respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities & Exchange Commission.

Before D.W. NELSON, WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The respondent's motion to amend the opinion is DENIED. The opinion filed April 24, 2003, is amended as follows:

2

Slip op. at 5318, line 13: Replace the phrase "Although the Commission's determination of the duty of care" with "Although the Commission's application of the duty of care to the facts of this case"

3

The time for filing a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc has expired. No petitions for rehearing shall be allowed on the basis of this amendment.

4

SO ORDERED.