Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Hayman v. United States

163 F.2d 1018

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-11-07
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hayman v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

HAYMAN v. UNITED STATES,163 F.2d 1018(9th Cir. 1947)

Herman HAYMAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11530.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 7, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William C. Mathes, Judge.

Walter L. Gordon, Jr., of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

James M. Carter, U.S. Atty., and Ernest A. Tolin, William Strong, and Paul Fitting, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.Page 4