Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois
Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. Reliance Ins. Co. of Ill., Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. Hawthorne Fin. Corp. v. M. Diane Koken, Ins. Comm’r of the Commonwealth of Pa., in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Ins. Co., Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Ins. Co. of Ill., 433 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2006-01-13
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- applying state substantive law to “a simple state-law contract claim between private parties” in federal court “solely on the [basis of] diversity of citizenship of the parties”
- declining to accord full faith and credit to the stay of litigation contained in the liquidation and rehabilitation orders issued by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in part on the grounds that state courts lack authority to enjoin litigation in federal courts
- “Under Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction apply state substantive law and federal procedural law.”
- "[t]he necessary question in cases such as this one is whether operation of the diversity jurisdiction statute actually 'invalidate[s], impair[s], or supersede[s]' the state's liquidation efforts"
- “[W]e read jury instructions as a whole to determine whether they are accurate.”
- diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Hawthorne Savings F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in her capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant,
Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Defendant.
No. 03-55548.
No. 03-55611.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 6, 2004.
Filed August 24, 2005.
Amended January 13, 2006.
W. Wendell Hall and Rosemarie Kanusky, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, Claudia Morehead and Robert S. Schulman, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, and Oscar Rey Rodriguez, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for the defendant-appellant.
Pamela H. Woldow, Chief Counsel, Insurance Department, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA, for the intervenor-appellant.
Jeffrey A. Tidus and David P. Crochetiere, Baute & Tidus LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-99-13119-DT(AJW), CV-99-13119-DT.
Before BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The Opinion filed on August 24, 2005 and appearing at 421 F.3d 835 (9th Cir.2005) is hereby amended as follows:
1) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11371, third to last line: after "state court do" add "under the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), CAL. INS. CODE §§ 1064.1-.12"
2) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11372, lines 5-6: replace "Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), CAL. INS. CODE §§ 1064.1-.12" with "UILA"
3) 421 F.3d at 856, Slip Op. p. 11378, line 16: after "stay its proceedings" add "under the UILA"