Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Geary v. Renne
895 F.2d 1230
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-02-06
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Geary v. Renne. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
GEARY v. RENNE,895 F.2d 1230(9th Cir. 1990)
BOB GEARY; ROBERT SILVESTRI; DENNIS MARK; MELISSA GUNDRUN; WAYNE JOHNSON;
DAVID SOULE; MAX WOODS; PETER JOHNSON; ROBERT GEBERT; ELECTION ACTION;
TERENCE FAULKNER; AND SUDI TRIPPET, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. LOUISE RENNE,
SAN FRANCISCO CITY ATTORNEY; DIANNE FEINSTEIN, SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR; BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, AND JAY PATTERSON, SAN FRANCISCO REGISTRAR OF VOTERS,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 88-2875.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 6, 1990.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL,Page 1231WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.