Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Eddie Javor v. United States
467 F.2d 481
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-12-12
- Topic
- litigation
*482 PER CURIAM: Petitioner appeals the denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contended that his retained attorney was incompetent, and that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel at his trial. The critical factual determination on the competence of counsel was made after a comprehensive hearing in which the district court gave careful consideration to every point urged by petitioner. The findings against the petitioner are supported by substantial evidence. Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eddie Javor v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
JAVOR v. UNITED STATES,467 F.2d 481(9th Cir. 1972)
EDDIE JAVOR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
No. 72-1502.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 25, 1972.
Rehearing Denied December 12, 1972.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellee.
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.fn*Page 482
[2] The critical factual determination on the competence of counsel was made after a comprehensive hearing in which the district court gave careful consideration to every point urged by petitioner. The findings against the petitioner are supported by substantial evidence.
[3] Affirmed.Page 484
- The Honorable William B. Enright, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. ↩