Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Charles L. Jordan v. County of Los Angeles
726 F.2d 1366
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-02-23
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- listing out the 12 subfactors to be analyzed within numerosity
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Charles L. Jordan v. County of Los Angeles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
SECOND ORDER AMENDING OPINION
(Opinion, Aug. 18, 1983, 11 Cir.1983, 713 F.2d 503)
Before TANG, SCHROEDER and NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The Order Amending Opinion filed January 19, 1984, * is withdrawn.
The opinion filed August 18, 1983, is amended as follows:
After the fourth paragraph of the opinion, the following paragraph shall be inserted:
Falcon does not prohibit “across the board” class formation in every instance. See [General Telephone Co. v.] Falcon [457 U.S. 147], 102 S.Ct. [2364] at 2371 n. 15 [72 L.Ed.2d 740] (Across the board
*1367 actions aimed at a specific hiring practice are permissible under Rule 23). However, even though it would be permissible to form a class of all black applicants challenging a specified hiring practice, we must conclude after recomputation of the actual number of rejected black applicants, that such a class in the present case would still fail under the numerosity requirement of Rule 23.
Editor’s Note: The only change made by the order of January 19, 1984, was the addition of a new paragraph after the fourth paragraph of the original opinion; the paragraph so added is revised by the second order of amendment.