Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cavanaugh v. Long

Cavanaugh v. Long, 252 F.2d 959 (9th Cir. 1958)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1958-02-24
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 555.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cavanaugh v. Long. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

CAVANAUGH v. LONG,252 F.2d 959(9th Cir. 1958)

John CAVANAUGH, Appellant, v. Charles J. LONG, Appellee.

No. 15530.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 24, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; John R. Ross, Judge.

Grubic, Drendel Bradley, William O. Bradley, Reno, Nev., for appellant.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Dudley, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Franklin P.R. Rittenhouse, U.S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for appellee.

Before HEALY, LEMMON, and BARNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion and order of the trial judge on the motion to dismiss, Cavanaugh v. McKenzie, D.C.,159 F. Supp. 555.Page 138