Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Bruno Agostino v. Homer Coal Corporation, a Corporation, and John T. Howell

220 F.2d 438

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1955-04-01
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. This was a suit by appellant to recover damages from appellees for allegedly wrongful interference with his attempt to obtain from the Department of the Interior a coal prospecting permit. The suit was dismissed by the District Court for failure to state a claim entitling the complainant to relief. The dismissal is affirmed for the reason given in the trial court’s opinion, 114 F.Supp. 861.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bruno Agostino v. Homer Coal Corporation, a Corporation, and John T. Howell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

AGOSTINO v. HOMER COAL CORPORATION,220 F.2d 438(9th Cir. 1955)

Bruno AGOSTINO, Appellant, v. HOMER COAL CORPORATION, a Corporation, and

John T. Howell, Appellees.

No. 14126.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 1, 1955.

Appeal from the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, Third Division; George W. Folta, Judge.

Bell Sanders, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant.

Juliana D. Wilson, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

Before HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit by appellant to recover damages from appellees for allegedly wrongful interference with his attempt to obtain from the Department of the Interior a coal prospecting permit. The suit was dismissed by the District Court for failure to state a claim entitling the complainant to relief.

The dismissal is affirmed for the reason given in the trial court's opinion,114 F. Supp. 861.Page 439